The Duality of Authenticity in ELT

J. John Love Joy

Abstract


Purpose: This study aims to find out the dual-perspectives on authenticity in English language teaching.
Problem: The concept of authenticity has generated quite a ripple in ESL/EFL classrooms. Contrasting perspectives have emerged over the years in reaction to this concept. Some regard authenticity as an inevitable part of teaching as it provides students with opportunities to interact with reality in the classroom itself, whereas, some others consider it an ambitious construct and suggest approaching it with caution.
Method: In order to verify these perspectives, a survey of literature has been done to trace the genesis of authenticity and its various facets.
Conclusion: As a result, we have found that a balanced outlook on authenticity is required by the teachers to promote better teaching-learning experiences.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allwright, R. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36(1), 5-19.

Arnold, E. (1991). Authenticity revisited: how real is real? English for Specific Purposes, 10(3), 237-244.

Bachman, L. F. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: assuring that what we count counts. Language Testing, 17(1), 1-42.

Bacon, S.M. (1989). Listening for real in the foreign-language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 543-551.

Breen, M. (1985). Authenticity in the language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 60-68.

Breen, M. (1987). Learner contributions to task design. In C.N. Candlin & D. Murphy (eds.) Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language Education: Language Learning Tasks 7. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 23-46.

Brosnan, D., Brown, K., & Hood, S. (1984). Reading in context. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Center.

Chavez, M.T. (1998). Learner's perspectives on authenticity. IRAL, 36(4), 277-306.

Clark, D.F. (1989). Communicative theory and its influence on materials production. Language Teaching, 22(2), 73-86.

Clark, M., & Silbertstein, S. (1977). Toward a realization of psycholinguistic principles in the ESL reading class. Language Learning, 21(1), 48-65.

Cooper, D.E. (1983). Authenticity and learning: Nietsche’s educational philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegen Paul.

Cronin, J.C. (1993). Four misconceptions about authentic learning. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 78-80.

Crossley, S., Louwerse, M., McCarthy, P., & McNamara, D. (2007). A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 15-30.

Davies, A. (1984). Simple, simplified and simplification: What is authentic? In Alderson, J.C., & Urguhart, A.H. Reading in a Foreign Language (pp. 181-198). London: Longman, 181-198.

Ellis, R. (1993). Interpretation-based grammar teaching. System, 21: 69-78.

Gatbonton, E., & Gu, G. (1994). Preparing and implementing a task-based ESL curriculum in an EFL setting: Implications for theory and practice. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 9-29.

Grellet, F., Maley, A., & Welssing, W. (1983). Quartet, Teacher’s: Book 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Guariento, W., & Morely, J. (2001). Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal, 55 (4), 347-353.

Kim, D. (2000). A qualitative approach to the authenticity in the foreign language classroom: a study of university students learning English in Korea. Texas Papers in Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 189-205.

Krashen, S.D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.

Lee, W. (1995). Authenticity revisited: text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT Journal, 49(4), 323-328.

Little, D., Devitt, S., and Singleton, D. (1988). Authentic Texts in Foreign Language Teaching: Theory and Practice. Dublin: Authentik.

Long, M., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26(1), 27-51.

Mishan, F. (2004). Authenticating corpora for language learning: a problem and its resolution. ELT Journal, 58(3), 219-227.

Morrow, K. (1977a). Authentic texts and ESP. In S. Holden. (Ed.), English for specific purposes (pp. 13-16). London: Modern English Publications.

Morrow, K. (1977b). Techniques of evaluation for a notional syllabus. London: University of Reading.

Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage. G.G. (1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50, 8-12.

Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centered curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Perkins, D. N. (1993). Teaching for understanding. American Educator, 17(3), 28-35.

Prabhu, N.S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richards, J., Platt, J., & Weber, H. (1985). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics. London: Longman.

Robinson, P. (1980). ESP: The Present Position. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Rogers, C., & Medley. Jr., F. (1988). Language with a purpose: using authentic materials in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 21, 467-478.

Taylor, D. (1994). Inauthentic authenticity or authentic inauthenticity? Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 1, 1-10.

Thornbury, S. (2006). An A-Z of ELT. Oxford: Macmillan.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.) (1998). Materials Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ur, P. (1984). Teaching listening comprehension. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London: Longman.

Wallace, J. (1992). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.

Widdowson, H.G. (1978). Teaching Language as communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Widdowson, H.G. (1979). Explorations in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies