Intrinsic Difficulties in Learning Common Greek-Originated English Words: The Case of Pluralization

Nurdan Kavaklı

Abstract


Knowing the origin of a language helps us to determine the historical background of that language. As language itself is such a system of a society that is continuously evolving as that aforementioned society learns and technologically develops along with its roots or origins. Like many other languages, English is also a language that has roots or origins in many different languages. In this sense, the English language, rooted as Anglo-Saxon, is known to derive most of its words from the Latin and Greek languages by whose modern cultures, it is assumed to be affected most. In this study, this derivation of words and the intrinsic difficulties probable to occur for English as a Foreign Language learners (hereafter EFLs) with a special interest upon the case of pluralization are scrutinized. That is why it is enlightened by the author of this paper within the scope of the historical background, the etymology of the English language within a linguistic perspective. As a result, the most common and confusing plural forms of Greek-originated English words, and some curing methods are defined.

 

 


Keywords


Intrinsic difficulties; Greek-originated; pluralization; EFL; etymology.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acton, W. (1984). Changing fossilized pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 18(1), 71-85.

Alms, A. (2007). Theology, trauerspiel, and the conceptual foundations of early German opera. City University: New York.

Bach, K. (2001). Semantically speaking. In I. Kenesei & R. M. Harnish (Eds..), Perspectives on semantics, pragmatics, and discourse: A festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer (pp. 147-166). John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam.

Bailey, G. (1997). When did southern American English begin. In E.W. Schneider (Ed.) Englishes around the world (pp. 255-275). John Benjamins Publishing: Amsterdam.

Bergs, A., & Brinton, L. J. (2012). English historical linguistics: An international handbook (2nd volume). Water de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG: Berlin.

Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.

Bréal, M. (1990). Chambers biographical dictionary: 5e. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Brinton, L. J., & Arnovick, L. K. (2006). The English language: A linguistic history. Oxford University Press, USA.

Bynon, T. (1977). Historical linguistics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Correli, L. (n.d.). Brief etymological background of the English word stock. Retrieved February 14, 2016 from http://www.omniglot.com/language/articles/etymology.htm.

Campbell, A. (1959). Old English grammar. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Condry, S.M. (1979). A developmental study of processes of word derivation in elementary school children and their relation to reading. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Cornell University.

Corson, D. J. (1985). The lexical bar. Pergamon Press: Oxford.

Critten, S., Connelly, V., Dockrell, J., & Walter, K. (2014). Inflectional and derivational morphological spelling abilities of children with Specific Language Impairment, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 948.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd edition). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Dash, N. S. (n.d.). The art of lexicography. Retrieved July 1, 2015 from http://www.eolss.net/Sample-Chapters/C04/E6-91- 16.pdf.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies