The Effect of Type of Context on EFL Learners' Recognition and Production of Colligations

Sasan Baleghizadeh, Asal Bakhshian Nik

Abstract


The present study investigated the effect of type of context (single sentence vs. paragraph) on the learning of English colligations. For this purpose, 23 Iranian EF learners in three intact classes participated in the study. Two sets of colligations (adjective+ preposition and preposition+ noun) were selected to be included in the study and the classes were randomly assigned to one control and two experimental groups. The control group (CG) received the colligations in a list, experimental group 1 (EG1) received each colligation in a single sentence, and experimental group 2 (EG2) received the same colligations in paragraphs of four to five lines. Two tests (a multiple- choice and a fill-in-the-blank) were administered to investigate the effect of type of context on the learners’ recognition and production of the colligations. A one-way ANOVA and a post hoc Scheffe test were run to analyze the data. The results revealed that the participants in the paragraph group (EG2) significantly outperformed the participants in the list group (CG) in terms of both recognition and production. However, there was no significant difference between the performance of the participants in EG1 and EG2 both on recognition and production tests. Besides, the difference in the performance of the participants in EG1 and CG in terms of recognition and production was not significant, either. It was concluded that contextualization would maximize learning and that a single sentence context would not serve a good definition of context.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Benson, M., Benson, E. & Ilson, R. (1997). The BBI dictionary of English word combinations. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Corrigan, R. (2007). An experimental analysis of the affective dimensions of deep vocabulary knowledge in inferring the meaning of words in context. Applied Linguistics, 28 (2), 211-240.

Engelbert, S. & Theuerkauf, B. (1999). Defining context within vocabulary acquisition. Language Teaching Research 3(1), 57-69.

Gabrielatos , C. (2007). If-conditionals as modal colligations: A corpus-based investigation. In M. Davies, P. Rayson, S. Hunston & P. Danielsson (eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference: Corpus Linguistics 2007. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.

Gardner, D. (2007). Validating the construct of word in applied corpus-based vocabulary research: A critical survey. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 241-265.

Hardi , A. (2008). A collocation-based approach to Nepali postpositions. Journal of Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 4(1), 19-61.

Marco, M. J. (1999). The different levels of language patterning. EPOS, XV, 313-334.

Martynska, M. (2004). Do English language learners know collocations? Investigationes Linguisticae, XI, 1-12.

Min, H-T. (2008). EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading. Language Learning, 58(1), 73-115.

Nesselhauf, N.(2003).The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 223-242.

Oxford, R. & Crookall, D. (1990). Vocabulary learning: A critical analysis of techniques. TESL Canada Journal, 7(2), 9-30.

Siepmann, D. (2006). Collocation, colligation and encoding dictionaries. International Journal of Lexicography, 18(4), 409-443.

Webb, S. (2007). Learning word pairs and glossed sentences: the effect of a single context on vocabulary knowledge. Language Teaching Research, 11(1), 63-81.

Xiao, R & McEnery, T. (2006). Collocation , semantic prosody, and near synonymy: a cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Linguistics, 27(1),103-129.

Yusuf , Y. Q. (2009). A corpus-based Linguistic analysis on written corpus: colligation of ''To '' and ''For''. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 5(2), 104-122.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies