The prospective EFL teachers' impressions towards teaching styles: Foresights for their professions

Ayfer Su Bergil, Ayşegül Erçevik

Abstract


The expending belief based on many researches and evidences across the world is that the teachers quality goes beyond the requirements of what the educational system provide for the whole stakeholders. In this sense, the promising quantity of  prospective English as a Foreign Language (EFL) deserves to maintain up to date and comprehensive knowledge of pedagogy which would furnish them with high standard teaching skills and competences. Therefore, this study focuses on delving into the teaching styles of 34 prospective EFL teachers, which will present the pedagogical knowledge of their teaching styles and how they will perform them when they are in action. For this purpose, Grasha's teaching style inventory consisting of 40 items in a 5 point likert type format were used to collect data. The descriptive statistics in addition to the parametric calculations promoting information related to the prospective EFL teachers in specific and general to attain the personal teaching style preferences of them and a prevailing sight about the disposition of the target prospective EFL teachers of Amasya University are taken into account in the data analysis process. The analysis process announce that the courses aimed to provide the prospective EFL teachers with professionalism should be elaborated and handled meticulously during their faculty education. Furthermore, the association between the teaching style preferences that prospective EFL teachers desire to teach and their real teaching style(s) they exhibit and declare professionally should be regarded by policy makers in the employment process of teachers.


Keywords


Teaching English as a foreign language; teaching styles; Grasha's teaching style

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amini, M. , Samani, S.& Lotfi, F. (2012). Reviewing Grasha teaching methods among faculty members of Shiraz medical school. Res. Dev. Med. Educ., 1 (2), 37-43.

Brekelmans, M., Levy, J., & Rodriguez, R. (1993). A typology of teacher communication style. In T. Wubbels and J. Levy (Eds.), Do you know what you look like? Interpersonal relationships in education (pp. 46 -55). London: The Falmer Press.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (6.baskı). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.

Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.

Dunn, R. S. ve Dunn, K. J. (1979). Learning styles and teaching styles: Should they can they be matched?. Educational Leadership, 36 (4), 238-244.

Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 3 - 6. Boston, USA: Allyn & Bacon.

Evans, C. (2004). Exploring the relationship between cognitive style and teaching. Educational Psychology, 24 (4), 509 – 531.

Evans, C. Harkins, M.J. & Young, J. D. (2008). Exploring teaching styles and cognitive styles: evidence from school teachers in Canada. North American Journal of Psychology, 10 (3), 567-582.

Farrell, T. S. C. (2015). Promoting teacher reflection in second language education: A framework for TESOL professionals. New York, NY: Routledge.

Fischer, B. B. & Fischer, L. (1979). Styles in teaching and learning. Educational Leadership, 36 (4), 245-254.

Grasha, A. F. (1983). Learnig Styles: Journey from Greenwich obeservatory (1769) to the college classroom. Improving College and University Teaching Journal, 32 (1), 46–53.

Grasha, A.F. (1994). A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator and delegator, College Teaching, 42 (4), 12- 20.

Grasha, A. F. (1994). A special section discovering your best teaching styles. College Teaching, 42 (4), 122-124.

Grasha, A.F. (1996). Teaching with style: Enchancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. Pittsburg, PA: Alliance Publishers.

Grasha, A. F. (2002). The dynamics of one-on-one teaching. College Teaching, 50 (4), 139-146.

Grasha, A. F. (2003). Teaching with Style: The integration of teaching and learning styles in the classroom. Social Studies, 94 (4), 179-187.

Grosse, C. U. (1986). Teaching and learning styles of ESL student teachers. JALT Journal, 8 (1), 37-50.

Heimlich, J. E. ve Norland, E. (1994). Developing teaching style in adult education. San Francisco, America: Jossey-Bass. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgiin/fulltext?pdf.

Joyce, B. & Weil, M. (1986). Models of teaching (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA, Allyn & Bacon.

Levine, G. (1998). Changing anticipated mathematics teaching style and reducing anxiety for teaching mathematics among pre-service elementary school teachers. Educational Research Quarterly, 21 (4), 37-46.

Mosston, M. & Ashworth, S. (1986). Teaching physical education (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Quirk, M. E. (1994). How to learn and teach in medical school: A learner-centered approach. New York, America: Charles C. Thomas Publishers.

Reinsmith, W. A. (1992). Archetypal forms in teaching: A continuum. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.

Reinsmith, W. A. (1994). Archetypal forms in teaching. College Teaching, 42 (4), 131-136.

Sarıçoban, A. & Behjoo Bahram M. (2016). Academic self efficacy and prospective ELT teachers achievement. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(1), 55-62. (Yayın No: 3041444)

Starbuck, G. H. (2003, April 9-12). College teaching styles by gender. Paper presented at Western Social Science Association Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

YeÅŸilbursa, A. A. (2017). Reflections from the EFL Classroom: Classroom interaction and reflective teacher development. Journal of Language Research, 1 (1), 19-24.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies