Public discourse: Systemic functional analysis of Trump’s and Biden’s inaugural speeches

Mohammad Awad AlAfnan

Abstract


This study critically analyzes the inaugural speeches of President Trump and President Biden using Critical Discourse Analysis and Systemic Functional Linguistics. The study focuses on transitivity, modality, and texture to identify the political purposes of the two speeches and how language serves ideology and power. Concerning transitivity, the analysis of the ideational function reveals Trump’s usage of ‘material process’ to portray himself as the ‘actor’ and the ‘doer’ with clear ‘goals’ (a strong leader) and Biden’s usage of ‘relational process’, ‘material process’ and ‘mental process’ to communicate vision, simplify abstract concepts and gain trust. Concerning modality, the investigation of the interpersonal function exposes that as Trump communicated his goals, vision, and manifesto directly through medium certainty and the future indicator ‘will’, Biden used high, medium, and low certainty modals to reflect on his vision, entrust the public and generate hope. Even though the structural perspective of low modality in Biden’s speech may suggest weak leadership and lack of confidence, the functional analysis reveals Biden’s fatherly-like approach to uplift morale and generate trust. The investigation of the thematic development and lexical cohesion in both speeches reveals Trump’s focus on concrete concepts (i.e., jobs, wealth, borders) and Biden’s focus on abstract concepts and American values (i.e., unity, democracy, racial justice). The textual analysis also demonstrates how ideologies are communicated through the usage of multiple synonymous references, excessive repetitions, and the conceptual use of ‘we’ and ‘others’.


Keywords


public discourse; ideational metafunction; interpersonal metafunction; textual metafunction; systemic functional linguistics; inaugural speeches

Full Text:

PDF

References


AlAfnan, M. A. (2015). Analyzing the rhetorical, typographical and paralinguistic features of electronic mails in the workplace. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(4), 77-85. doi: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.4p.77

AlAfnan, M. A. (2018). Language use as a resource: E-communication dimensions of register variation in a professional context. Journal of Progressive Research in Social Sciences, 7(2), 502-526.

AlAfnan, M. A. (2019). An investigation into texture, power and ideology in electronic news articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8(5), 77-81. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.5p.77

AlAfnan, M. A. (2020). COVID 19-The foreign virus: Media bias, ideology and dominance in Chinese and American newspaper articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9(1), 56-60. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.9n.1p.56

AlAfnan, M. A. (2021a). Diglossic features of the Arabic-speaking community in Australia: The influences of age, education, and prestige. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 462 470. Doi: 10.52462/jlls.29

AlAfnan, M. A. (2021b). The influences of corporate cultures on business communication: An ethnographic and textual analysis. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 10(2). Doi: 10.22495/jgrv10i2art3

Christie, M. J. (1987). Discipline. In M. Christie, S. Harris & D. McClay (Eds.), Teaching Aboriginal children: Milingimbi and beyond (pp. 118-123). Mount Lawley, W.A.: Institute of Applied Aboriginal Studies, Western Australian College of Advanced Education.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London, England: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4, 133-168. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002002

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London, England: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, England: Routledge

Fairclough, N. (2005). Critical genre analysis. Marges Linguistiques, 9, 76-94. Retrieved from http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/staff/norman/critdiscanalysis.doc

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press [Republished by Oxford University Press 1989]

Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K., and Matthiessen, C. M. I. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London, England: Routledge.

Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse. London, England: Continuum.

Matthiessen, C.M.I. and Halliday, M.A.K. (1997). Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Sydney, NSW: Macquarie University.

Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4, 249-283. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002006

Van Dijk, T.A. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schaffner & A. L. Wenden (Eds.), Language and Peace (pp. 17-33). Sudbury, MA: Dartmouth Publishing, Inc

Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Opinions and ideologies in the press. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse. Massachusetts, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Discourse, ideology and context. Folia Linguistica, 35(1/2), 11-40. Retrieved from http://discourses.org/OldArticles/Discourse


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies