Non-metrical vowel optimization and iambic unevenness in Arabic

Ammar Alammar

Abstract


In this paper, I propose a constraint-based analysis for three processes affecting short vowels. In the Zilfaawi, Negev, and Jordanian dialects, syncope targets [i, u] in non-final open syllables, while raising targets [a] in the same environment in Negev and Zilfaawi. I analyze deletion of [i, u] and raising of [a] as a pressure to reduce the duration of short vowels in open syllables (Kirchner, 1996). Zilfaawi also has deletion of [a], which only happens in the dependent syllable of an iamb, which I analyze as promoting the unevenness of the iamb (McCarthy, 2003). Gouskova (2003) claims that vowel processes must be due to either metrical or sonority constraints on nuclei and foot branches. Moreover, she argues that while the marked segment can be banned, the least marked segment cannot be. I will show that high vowel deletion and low vowel raising in these dialects cannot be attributed to these constraints but rather must be attributed to a Reduce constraint that minimizes vowels duration in open syllables. In Zilfaawi, low vowel deletion applies before a light syllable: in an open syllable followed by another non-final open syllable, and in an open syllable followed by a final CVC (where the word-final C is weightless). However, deletion is blocked before a heavy syllable. This deletion process is metrical, because low vowels delete to improve the duration contrast inside iambs, making the dependent syllable as short as possible, leaving the preceding consonant as a semi-syllable.


Keywords


phonology; Zilfaawi Arabic; metrical; iamb; duration

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Sughayer, K. (1990). Aspects of comparative jordanian and modern standard arabic phonology (Order No. 9117788). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (303845877). Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.sdl.idm.oclc.org/dissertations-theses/aspects-comparative-jordanian-modern-standard/docview/303845877/se-2?accountid=142908

Alderete, J. D. (1999). Morphologically governed accent in optimality theory (Order No. 9932283). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304515384). Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.sdl.idm.oclc.org/dissertations-theses/morphologically-governed-accent-optimality-theory/docview/304515384/se-2?accountid=142908

Alghazo, M. H. (1987). Syncope And Epenthesis In Levantine Arabic: A Nonlinear Approach (Order No. 8721572). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (303584737). Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.sdl.idm.oclc.org/dissertations-theses/syncope-epenthesis-levantine-arabic-nonlinear/docview/303584737/se-2?accountid=142908

Bakovic, E. J. (1996). Foot harmony and quantitative adjustments. Rutgers Optimality Archive. ROA-168. Retrieved on December 31, 2020 from: http://roa.rutgers.edu/article/view/179

Bessell, N. J. (1992). Towards a phonetic and phonological typology of post-velar articulation (Order No. NN80826). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (304051416). Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.sdl.idm.oclc.org/dissertations-theses/towards-phonetic-phonological-typology-post-velar/docview/304051416/se-2?accountid=142908

Blanc, H. (1970). The Arabic dialect of the Negev bedouins. Proceedings of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 112-150. Jerusalem: Jerusalem Academic Press.

Broselow, E., Chen, S.-I., & Huffman, M. (1997). Syllable weight: Convergence of phonology and phonetics. Phonology, 14(1), 47–82.

Cho, Y. Y., & King, T. H. (2003). Semi-syllables and universal syllabification. In C. Féry & R. van de Vijver (Eds.), The syllable in optimality theory (pp. 183-212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Féry, C. (2003). Onsets and Non-Moraic Syllables in German. In C. Féry & R. van de Vijver (Eds.), The syllable in optimality theory (pp. 213-237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gouskova, M. (2003). Deriving economy: Syncope in optimality theory (Order No. 3110492). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (305322251). Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.sdl.idm.oclc.org/dissertations-theses/deriving-economy-syncope-optimality-theory/docview/305322251/se-2?accountid=142908

Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Hyde, B. (2003). NonFinality. Rutgers Optimality Archive. ROA-633. Retrieved on December 24, 2020 from: http://roa.rutgers.edu/article/view/643

Kager, R. (1999). Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kiparsky, P. (2003). Syllables and moras in Arabic. In Caroline Féry and Ruben van de Vijver (eds.), The Syllable in Optimality Theory, 147-182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kirchner, R. (1996). Synchronic chain shifts in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 27(2), 341-350.

Lombardi, L. (1999). Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17, 267-302.

Lombardi, L. (2003). Markedness and the typology of epenthetic vowels. Rutgers Optimality Archive. ROA-578. Retrieved on December 23, 2020 from: http://roa.rutgers.edu/article/view/588

McCarthy, J. (2003). Sympathy, cumulativity, and the Duke-of-York gambit. In Caroline Féry and Ruben van de Vijver (eds.), The Syllable in Optimality Theory, 23-76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Prince, A. (1990). Quantitative consequences of rhythmic organization. Chicago Linguistic Society, 26(2), 355-398.

Prince, A & Smolensky, P. (2002). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Rutgers Optimality Archive. ROA 537. Retrieved on December 15, 2020 from http://roa.rutgers.edu/article/view/547

Selkirk, E. (1984). On the major class features and syllable theory. In M. Aronoff and R. Oehrle (eds.), Language sound structure, 107-136. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Sprouse, R. (1996). Vowels that borrow moras: Geminates and weight in OT. Proceedings-NELS, 393-408. University of Massachusetts.

Watson, J. (2007). Syllabification patterns in Arabic dialects: Long segments and mora sharing. Phonology, 24(2), 335-356.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies