Investigating the performance of Iraqi EFL researchers in writing quantitative and qualitative researches

Rusul Assim Abood, Assim Abood Zbar Alalwany

Abstract


In this research, the researcher adopts a practical and the theoretical parts. First, is the practical part, it consists of the problem, the aim, the hypothesis, the procedures and the limits of the study. These will be in the first part. In part two which is the theoretical part, the researcher indicates two main types of researches which are quantitative and qualitative research. Then the research is dedicated to the description of methodology, the results and finally the conclusion. The study aims first to clarify the quantitative and qualitative researches and second to investigate the performance of Iraqi EFL researchers in writing quantitative and qualitative researches. The main tool that is used in this research is the questionnaire which was included personal information such as (bachelor of education) and teachers (master and doctorate) and different questions about quantitative or qualitative researches. It combined (30) participants, (20) as fourth stage researchers, and (10) for lecturer, it was designed to measure which of the researchers has knowledge about the two types of researches, and how can they distinguish between each one, what are the main different points between quantitative and qualitative research. We can see the results from their answers when we analyze the questionnaire.

Keywords


Quantitative; Qualitative; Researches; Study; Types; Questionnaire

Full Text:

PDF

References


Daniel, E. (2016) The Usefulness of Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Researching Problem-Solving Ability in Science Education Curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(15), 2016, P. 92.

Elkatawneh, H. H. (2016). Comparing Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Walden University; University of the Rockies. anuary 2016SSRN Electronic Journal DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2742779, pp. 3-4.

Fielding, Nigel & Schreier, Margrit (2001). Introduction: On the Compatibility between Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods, 2(1), Art. 4, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs010146. P.7.

Fischler, A. S. (2018). Quantitative research method, https:education.nova.edu. pp. 13-14.

H.H. (2016). Quantitative and Qualitative research, Lancaster University, www.lancaster.ac.uk. P. 1.

Park. (2012). Quantitative and qualitative research techniques for humanitarian need assessment, www.parkdatabase.org, pp. 4- 5.

Williams, C. (2007). Research Methods, Grand Canyon University: Grand Canyon University press. P.3.

Zemgales Planning. (2010). Methodology of qualitative research, Region, www.zemgales.iv, pp. 6,8,9,11.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies