Psycholinguistic tactics of the content encoding and decoding within the coherent belles-lettres text whole of English

Viktoriya O. Andrushchenko, Iryna A. Blynova

Abstract


The article deals with analysis of one most prominent problem of contemporary text linguistics – psycholinguistic peculiarities of its structural coherence and sense completion. The research is focused on trace of linguistic coherence of the English belles-lettres style text whole on formal, semantic, communicative and paradigmatic levels that is represented by linear, parallel, integrative, intratextual interlinear syntactic links (ITISLs) manifestation in correlation with sense interlinear relations (SIRs) and destructive-incomplete (contextual, segmented, broken, parceled and elliptical) sentences (ISs) within a range of supra-phrasal unities (SPUs) – belles-lettres style text structure proper. Established linguistic patterns of horizontal-vertical coherence realization by means of ITISLs, SIRs and ISs representation research in the analyzed English language thematic-synchronic belles-lettres style text formations boundaries are qualified as definite universal psycholinguistic tactics which application enables an addressee to decode the most significant idea-sense, informative-communicative and contensive-thematic lines of belles-lettres style text that appear to be intentionally encoded in its content by an addresser. This kind of perspective on belles-lettres style text unity analysis in psycholinguistic aspect allows identifying and reflecting both addresser and addressee’s effective interaction process which positive result depends on a recipient’s interpretive behaviour of an author’s linguistically encoded idea.


Keywords


sense completion; addresser; verbal memory; language markers; supra-phrasal fragments

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agricola, E. (1976). Vom Text zum Thema. Probleme der Textgrammatik. Studia Grammatica, XI, 13-27.

Andrushchenko, V. (2015). Coherence Interlevel-Linguistic Manifestation within a Belles-Lettres Style Text Formation. In: A.P. Zahnitko (Ed.), Linguistic Studies: International collection of scientific papers (pp. 89-93). Kyiv-Vinnytsia: DonNU.

Arutyunova, N.D. (1972). The syntactic types of fiction. In: General and Roman Linguistics (pp. 189-199). Moscow: Nauka.

Atabekova, A. (2019). Technology-facilitated harm to individuals and society: Cases of minor’s self-produced sexual content in Russia. Journal of Critical Reviews, 6(6), 410-415.

Atabekova, A. (2020). University discourse to foster youth's sustainability in society amidst COVID19: International and Russian Features. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(18), 2463.

Belousov, K.I., & Blaznova, N.A. (2005). The introduction to experimental linguistics. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka.

Bever, T.G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In: J.R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the Development of Language. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Blynova, I. (2019). Informational Content Category of the Comic Discourse. Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University: Scientific Journal. Philology Series, 8(76), 21–25.

Buitkiene, J. (2005). Variability of Cohesive Devices across Registers. Studies about Languages, 7, 17–20.

Dobruskina, E.M., & Berzon, V.E. (1986). The syntactic supra-phrasal ties and their engineering-linguistic modelling. Kishinev: Shtinitsa.

Dressler, V. (1978). Text syntax. The New in Foreign Linguistics, 8, 111–137.

Galperin, I.R. (2004). Text as an object of linguistic research. Moscow: Editorial.

Garipova, V., Ayupova, R.A., & Markova, E.M. (2019). Linguistic means of description of family relations in the novel In Chancery by J. Galsworthy. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 10(Special Issue), 416-423.

Gindin, S.I. (1971). The ontological unity of a text and types of intertextual organization. Machine Translation and Applied Linguistics, 14, 114–135.

Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Isenberg, H. (1978). The issue of the subject of text linguistic theory. The New in Foreign Linguistics, 8, 43–56.

Issakova, S.S., Kultanbayeva, N.K., Kushtayeva, M.T., Saduakas N.A., Aitbenbetova, A.K., & Imangazina, A.A. (2021). Fairytale discourse as a demonstration of the national mentality (On the material of Kazakh and Russian fairy tales). Astra Salvensis, 2021, 121-135.

Karasik, V.I., & Sternin, I.A. (2005). The anthology of concepts. Volgograd: Paradigma.

Kintsel, A.V. (2000). The psycholinguistic research of an emotional-sense contour as a text-formative factor. Barnaul: Altaic University.

Kolesnikova, S.M., Markova, E.M., Burskaya, E.A., Chibisova, A.V. (2020). Concept of “family” in the Russian and Chinese linguoculture: Cognitive, phonosemantic and educational aspects. Asia Life Sciences, 22(2), 229-242.

Konyratbayeva, Z.M., Tussupbekova, M.Zh., Zagatova, S.B., Satemirova, D.A., & Mukhtarkhanova, A. (2021). The principles of the forming of godonyms in the Kazakhstan onomastic map. Astra Salvensis, 2021, 27-40.

Korbut, A.Yu. (2011). Linguistic poetics. Irkutsk: The East Siberian State Academy of Education.

Krasnykh, V.V. (2001). The basics of psycholinguistics and theory of communication. Moscow: ITDGK “Gnosis”.

Kumral N. (2013). Semiotic analysis of textual communication in Snow by Julia Alvarez. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 9(2), 31-44

London, J. (2004). Martin Eden. London: Macmillan and Company Edition.

Matveeva, T.V. (1990). The functional styles in aspect of text categories: A synchronic-comparative study. Sverdlovsk: Ural State University.

Maugham, W.S. (2006). The Painted Veil. London: Longman Edition.

Moskalchuk, G.G. (2003). Text structure as a synergetic process. Moscow: Editorial URSS.

Moskalskaya, O.I. (1981). Grammar of the text. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola.

Paducheva, E.V. (1985). The utterance and its interrelation with reality. Moscow: Progress.

Pishchalnikova, V.A. (2009). General linguistics. Moscow: ITS “Akademiya”.

Pravdin, M.N. (1974). The analysis of text structure content. Text Linguistics, 2, 15–19.

Price, C.J. (1998). The functional anatomy of word comprehension and production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(8), 281-288.

Pulvermüler, F. (2001). Brain reflections of words and their meanings. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(12), 517-524.

Radzievskaya, T.V. (1993). Text as a means of communication. Kyiv: Ukrainian Academy of Sciences.

Sanger, P.A., Pavlova, I.V., Shageeva, F.T., Khatsrinova, O.Y., Ivanov, V.G. (2018). Introducing project based learning into traditional Russian engineering education. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 715, 821-829.

Selivanova, O.O. (2010). Linnvistic encyclopedia. Poltava: Dovkillya-K.

Sevbo, I.P. (1969). The coherent text structure and automated abstracting. Moscow: Flinta.

Susov, I.P. (2009). Linguistic pragmatics. Vynnytsa: Nova Knyha.

Tahiri L., & Muhaxheri N. (2020). Stylistics as a tool for critical language awareness. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 1735-1746.

Turayeva, Z.Ya. (1986). Text linguistics: Structure and semantics. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye.

Tussupbekova, M.Z., Idrissova, M.A., Smagulova, B.G., Kazhikenova N.K., Konyratbaeva, Z.M., & Abduali, B. (2019). Action research in teaching English for students of non-linguistic specialties in higher schools. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 5(2), 354-359.

van Dijk, T.A. (1989). Language. Knowledge. Communication. Moscow: Progress.

Viehweger, D. (1979). Text linguistics in research of GDR scholars. In: Text Syntax (pp. 314-323). Moscow: Nauka.

Vorobyova, O.P. (1993). Text categories and an addressee factor. Kyiv: Vysshaya shkola.

Zahnitko, A. P. (2001). The Ukrainian language is theoretical. Syntax. Donetsk: DonNU.

Zahnitko, A.P. (2010). Ukrainian syntax. Donetsk-Slovyansk: DonNU.

Zalevskaya, A.А. (2001). The text and its understanding. Tver: Tver State Institute.

Zharylgapov, Z., Rustemova, Z., Takirov, S., Kenzhegaliev, S., & Beisentai, A. (2020). Typology of realism and Kazakh literary studies. Opcion, 36(Special Edition 26), 39-56.

Zyubina, I.A., Filippova, M.Iu., Minakova, N.A., Krivoshlykova, L.V., & Anikejeva, I.G. (2020). Synchronous personal method of language studying speech behavior in implicit pragmalinguistics. XLinguae, 13(4), 81-90.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies