Developing Iraqi EFL preparatory students' performance in reading comprehension by flipped learning strategy

Sabeeha Hamza Dehham, Haider Kadhim Bairmani, Mohsin Ali Shreeb

Abstract


According to the researchers, the aim of this study is to determine the impact of the flipped learning approach on fifth-year students' understanding of reading content during their last year of preparatory education. To confirm the results of the study, the null hypothesis was developed, which claims that the experimental group's mean scores are not statistically significant when compared to the control group's mean scores when using the flipped learning strategy. To test the effectiveness of flipped learning, an experimental approach was used to create two equivalent experimental groups with a control group. One group learned by the flipped learning strategy and the other used the regular method for the second course (2019-2020) over eight weeks, with three classes each week. According to the findings, there are significant differences between experimental and control group means of reading comprehension and experimental group favor. The divergence in these parameters is a result of the experimental group using the Flipped Learning Strategy in their lessons.


Keywords


EFL; preparatory students; performance; reading comprehension; flipped learning; strategy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbas, I. D. H., Dehham, S. H., & Akbar, N. A. (2018). The Psychological Effects of Clickers Technology on English Language Students. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 9(10).

Abood, R. A., & Alalwany, A. A. Z. (2021). Investigating the performance of Iraqi EFL researchers in writing quantitative and qualitative researches. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(4).

Ahmad, D., & Arifin, M. A. (2021). Exploring student achievement and perceptions in an online flipped grammar course. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v10i3.31750.

Ali, D. B., Dehham, S. H., & Nayif Hasan, A. A. (2019). The Effect of Using Index Cards Games Technique on Iraqi EFL Intermediate Students’ Performance on Writing Skill. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 10(1).

Ali, S. A. S., Al-Rifa, F. K., & Hamad, S. (2019). The effct of main idea pyramid strategy on fourth year preparatory school students’ performance in reading comperhension. Journal of Education and Scientific Studies, 1(14).

Alwehebi, K. (2021). The flipped classroom strategy: helping student teachers' lesson plan writing and teaching skills. Asian ESP Journal, 17(3.2), 65-89.

Aromaih, A. (2021). EFL learning during the Covid19 pandemic: An exploration of best parameters in Saudi Arabia. Asian ESP Journal, 25-42.

Bairmani, H. K., Shreeb, M. A., & Dehham, S. H. (2021). Iraqi EFL college students' awareness of plagiarism. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(4).

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International society for technology in education.

Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 23-1200).‏

Bransford, J., Cocking, R. R., & Brown, A. L. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Expanded edition. National Academies Press.

Davis, F. B. (1944). Fundamental factors of comprehension in reading. Psychometrika, 9(3), 185-197.‏

Dehham, S. H. (2021). Iraqi EFL Students’ Ability in Acquiring English Vocabulary by Peer Instruction Technology. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(9), 1634-1639.‏

Dehham, S. H., Nayif Hasan, A. A., & Farj, I. I. (2020). Analysis of the Psychological Effect of Scamper Education Program and Creative Thinking among Primary Pupils. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 11(4).

Dehham, S. H. (2021). Enhancing Iraqi EFL Preparatory School Students' Speaking Skill By Using Debate Technique. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(7), 3189-3196.

Doyle, D. J. (2004). GlideScope®-assisted fiberoptic intubation: a new airway teaching method. The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, 101(5), 1252-1252.

Farrell, T. S., & Farrell, T. S. C. (2009). Teaching reading to English language learners: A reflective guide. Corwin press.

Girmen, P., & Kaya, M. F. (2019). Using the Flipped Classroom Model in the Development of Basic Language Skills and Enriching Activities: Digital Stories and Games. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 555-572.

Hammad, A. A., Dehham, S. H., & Akbar, N. A. (2018). The Impact of Using Tablets on Developing Listening Skill & perception as a Brain Process of EFL Primary School Pupils. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 9(12).‏

Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. (2009). The complexity of teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Tensions between the needs of schools and students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 16(3), 365-381.‏

Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.

Huang, S. H. (2016). Communicative Language Teaching: Practical Difficulties in the Rural EFL Classrooms in Taiwan. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 186-202.

Johnson, L., & Renner, J. (2012). Effect of the flipped classroom model on a secondary computer applications course: Student and teacher perceptions, questions and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

Kareem, H. H., Dehham, S. H., & Al-Wahid, M. A. (2019). The impact of teaching the creative writing by FOCUS strategy to develop. Indian Journal of Public Health, 10(6).

Kelly, J. A. (2004). Teaching the world: A new requirement for teacher preparation. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(3), 219-221.‏

Kibui, P. G. (2012). A Critique of the contribution of Constructive learning approach to the development of critical thinking (Doctoral dissertation).

McDonald, K., & Smith, C. M. (2013). The flipped classroom for professional development: part I. Benefits and strategies. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 44(10), 437-438.‏

Nuttal, C. (1982). Teaching English in Foreign Language.‏ London: Oxford University Press.

Park, J. K., & Kim, M. K. (2014). Teaching and learning of EIL in Korean culture and context. In The pedagogy of English as an international language (pp. 47-61). Springer, Cham.

Rahoomi, R. K., Dehham, S. H., & Al-Wahid, M. A. (2019). The Impact of Reading Strategy Knowledge and Science Knowledge on Developing Reading Skills of School Students. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 10(10).‏

Rivers, W. M. (2018). Teaching foreign language skills. University of Chicago Press.

Rubin, D. (1993). A practical approach to teaching reading. Allyn & Bacon. ‏

Ruddick, K. W. (2012). Improving chemical education from high school to college using a more hands-on approach. The University of Memphis.

Sikiotis, N. (1981). Reading Habits and Preferences of Secondary School Pupils in Greece. English Language Teaching Journal, 35(3), 300-6.

Smith, S. M. (1982). Enhancement of recall using multiple environmental contexts during learning. Memory & Cognition, 10(5), 405-412.‏

Tavakoli, P., & Howard, M. J. (2012). Teaching English to speakers of other languages teachers’ views on the relationship between research and practice. European journal of teacher education, 35(2), 229-242.

Wigfield, A., Lutz, S. L., & Wagner, A. L. (2005). Early adolescents’ development across the middle school years: Implications for school counselors. Professional school counseling, 9(2), 2156759X0500900206.

William, F. (2009). Design and trial of activity–based approach and materials on acids, bases and indicators for improving teaching and learning of chemistry in Tanzanian secondary schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Dar es Salaam).

Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International review of research in open and distributed learning, 17(3), 313-340.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies