A Bakhtinian Understanding of Social Constructivism in Language Teaching

Doğan Yüksel

Abstract


It is generally accepted that there is not a single school of thought that is called social constructivism, and ideas and assumptions from various disciplines in different fields are being incorporated into the social constructivist understanding. In this paper, a Bakhtinian perspective of social constructivism on education and language learning is discussed and studies that have explored Bakhtinian concepts in education have been reviewed. It is recommended that examining the structure of social interaction in the classroom based on the Bakhtinian concepts discussed (i.e., dialogism, monologism, recitation) can help us see the classrooms from a different perspective and provide insights that are not available from other perspectives.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Applebee, A. (1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogical imagination. (M. Holquist, Ed., C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Bakhtin, M.M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. (C. Emerson, Ed. & Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Michigan Press.

Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (V. W. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Britton, J. (1970). Language and learning. London: Allen Lane.

Carlsen, W. S. (1991) Questioning in classrooms: A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of Educational Research, 61, 157-178.

Cazden, C. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Collins, J. (1982). Discourse style, classroom interaction and differential treatment. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 143-159.

Dunn, W.E., & Lantolf, J. (1998). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and

Krashen's i+ 1: Incommensurable constructs; incommensurable theories.

Language Learning, 48, 411- 442.

Eder, D. (1981). Ability grouping as a self-fulfilling prophecy: A micro-analysis of teacher student interaction. Sociology of Education, 54, 151-62.

Gutierrez, K. D. (1994). How talk, context, and script shape contexts for learning: A

cross-case comparison of journal sharing. Linguistics and Education, 5, 335-65.

Hall, J.K., Vitanova, G., & Marchenkova, L. (Eds.) (2005). Dialogue with Bakhtin on second and foreign language learning: New perspectives. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Linell, P. (2004). Essentials of dialogism: Aspects and elements of a dialogical approach to language, communication and cognition. Unpublished manuscript, Retrieved February 17, 2004, from http://www.tema.liu.se/temak/personal/perli/Linell_Essentials-of-dialogism.pdf

Lotman, Y. M. (1988). Text within a text. Soviet Psychology, 26(3), 32-51.

McCormick, D. E., & Donato, R. (2000). Teacher questions as scaffolded assistance in an ESL classroom. In J. K. Hall & L. S. Verplaetse (Eds.), The development of second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.

Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Nystrand, M. (1991). Making it hard: Curriculum and instruction as factors in the

difficulty of literature. In A. C. Purves, (Ed.), The idea of difficulty in literature (pp. 141-156). New York: State University of New York Press.

Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press (with A. Gamoran, R Kachur, & C. Prendergast).

Nystrand, M. (2004). CLASS 4.0 user's manual. The National Research Center on

English Learning & Achievement.

Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261-290.

Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1997). The big picture: The language of learning in dozens of English lessons. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A., & Heck, M. J. (1993). Using small groups for response to and thinking about literature. English Journal, 82(1), 14-22.

O’Connor, M. C. (1998). Can we trace the ‘efficacy of social constructivism? Review of Research in Education, 22, 1-47.

Skidmore, D. (2000). From pedagogical dialogue to dialogical pedagogy. Language

and Education, 14(4), 283-296.

Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching and learning in context. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Volosinov, V.N. (1976). Freudianism: a critical sketch. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Wells, G. (1999a). Dialogic inquiry: Toward sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wells, G. (1999b). Language and education: Reconceptualizing education as dialogue. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 135-155.

Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Wilhelm, J. D. (2005). Inquiring minds learn to read and write: Inquiry, questioning, and discussion strategies for promoting literacy and learning across the curriculum. Unpublished manuscript, Retrieved February 17, 2005, from http://www.boisestate.edu/english/jwilhelm/downloads.htm.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies